Shunning Uncertainty: The Neglect of Learning Opportunities
Richard Zeckhauser and
Stefan Trautmann
Scholarly Articles from Harvard Kennedy School of Government
Abstract:
Financial, managerial, and medical decisions often involve alternatives whose possible outcomes have uncertain probabilities. In contrast to alternatives whose probabilities are known, these uncertain alternatives offer the benefits of learning. In repeat-choice situations, such learning brings value. If probabilities appear favorable (unfavorable), a choice can be repeated (avoided). In a series of experiments involving bets on the colors of poker chips drawn from bags, decision makers often prove to be blind to the learning opportunities offered by uncertain probabilities. Such decision makers violate rational decision making and forgo significant expected payoffs when they shun uncertain alternatives in favor of risky ones. Worse, when information is revealed, many make choices contrary to learning. A range of factors explain these violations. The results indicate that priming with optimal strategies offers little improvement.
Date: 2011
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cbe and nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Published in HKS Faculty Research Working Paper Series
Downloads: (external link)
http://dash.harvard.edu/bitstream/handle/1/5347068/RWP11-044_Zeckhauser.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Shunning uncertainty: The neglect of learning opportunities (2013) 
Working Paper: Shunning Uncertainty: The Neglect of Learning Opportunities (2011) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hrv:hksfac:5347068
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Scholarly Articles from Harvard Kennedy School of Government Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office for Scholarly Communication ().