Undesirable specialization in the construction of composite policy indicators: The Environmental Performance Index
Nicky Rogge ()
Additional contact information
Nicky Rogge: Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel (HUB)
No 2012/08, Working Papers from Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management
Abstract:
The non-parametric Data Envelopment Analysis approach is increasingly used to construct composite indicators for country performance monitoring, benchmarking, and policy evaluation in a large variety of fields. The flexibility in the definition of aggregation weights is praised as the method's most important advantage: DEA allows each evaluated country to look for its own optimal weights that maximize the composite indicator relative to the other countries. However, this flexibility also carries a potential disadvantage as it may allow countries to appear as a brilliant performer in a manner that is hard to justify: by ignoring or overemphasizing one or multiple of the judiciously selected performance indicators. To illustrate this issue of undesirable specialization in DEA-based evaluations, this paper compares the Environmental Performance Index (EPI) as computed by the optimistic and pessimistic version of the DEA-model as proposed by Zhou et al. (2007). Based on both computed composites, undesirable specialization in performance is identified.
Keywords: Data envelopment analysis; benefit of the doubt; Composite indicators; Expert opinion; Undesirable specialization; Environmental Performance Index (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 30 page
Date: 2012-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-eff and nep-env
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (41)
Downloads: (external link)
https://lirias.hubrussel.be/bitstream/123456789/6128/1/12HRP08.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:hub:wpecon:201208
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working Papers from Hogeschool-Universiteit Brussel, Faculteit Economie en Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sabine Janssens ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).