EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

DO FEMALE CONSUMERS HAVE HIGHER ETHICAL PERCEPTIONS OF MARKETING?

Robert D. Green and Ghensy Antoine

Global Journal of Business Research, 2011, vol. 5, issue 1, 85-100

Abstract: Studies have found either females being more ethical than males or no significant differences. Ethical evaluations and judgments lead to intentions, and behavior. Furthermore, marketing activities create positive, e.g., ethical, or negative, e.g., unethical, perceptions of firms’ market offerings. The purpose is to make an initial study of consumers’ ethical perceptions of firms’ marketing strategy and to clarify prior findings of these somewhat inconsistent results of gender differences toward marketing ethics. Two propositions are presented with each under different cues and intensiveness levels. The conclusion is that under certain conditions – it depends – there are differences between male and female consumers’ ethical perception of firms’ marketing strategy.

Keywords: Consumer behavior; ethical perceptions of marketing; gender differences of ethics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D11 M31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.theibfr2.com/RePEc/ibf/gjbres/gjbr-v5n1-2011/GJBR-V5N1-2011-8.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:85-100

Access Statistics for this article

Global Journal of Business Research is currently edited by Terrance Jalbert

More articles in Global Journal of Business Research from The Institute for Business and Finance Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mercedes Jalbert ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ibf:gjbres:v:5:y:2011:i:1:p:85-100