Suboptimal choices and the need for experienced individual well-being in economic analysis

Christopher K. Hsee, Yuval Rottenstreich and Alois Stutzer

International Journal of Happiness and Development, 2012, vol. 1, issue 1, 63-85

Abstract: Standard economic analysis assumes that people make choices that maximise their utility. Yet both popular discourse and other fields assume that people sometimes fail to make optimal choices and thus adversely affect their own happiness. Most social sciences thus frequently describe some patterns of decision as suboptimal. We review evidence of suboptimal choices that arise for two reasons. First, people err in predicting the utility they may accrue from available choice options due to the evaluation mode. Second, people choose on the basis of salient rules that are unlikely to maximise utility. Our review is meant to highlight the possibility of a research programme that combines economic analysis with measures of individuals' experienced well-being to improve people's happiness.

Keywords: suboptimal choices; individual well-being; experienced utility; evaluation mode; salient rule; utility misprediction; economic analysis; happiness. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (18)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=50826 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
Working Paper: Suboptimal Choices and the Need for Experienced Individual Well-Being in Economic Analysis (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijhdev:v:1:y:2012:i:1:p:63-85

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Happiness and Development from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().