EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Business growth models: review of past 60 years

Matti Muhos, Pekka Kess, Kongkiti Phusavat and Sitthinath Sanpanich

International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development, 2010, vol. 8, issue 3, 296-315

Abstract: This study reviews growth configurations research published over the past 60 years. Numerous configuration models seek to clarify the management priorities in the early growth of companies. However, an extensive review is missing from the literature and the variability of attributes among the models leads to confusion. The study identifies 90 configuration studies, describes the common patterns and trends, and identifies well-covered areas and promising research challenges. This meta-analysis reveals increasing consensus on growth indicators, sharpening focus, increasing context and process specificity, and diversification. Future approaches are encouraged to provide context-specific empirical studies, and to open new viewpoints.

Keywords: business growth models; company growth; growth stages; configuration models; small and medium-sized enterprises; SMEs; common patterns; trends; growth indicators; process specificity; context-specific studies; management; enterprise development. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.inderscience.com/link.php?id=34865 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:8:y:2010:i:3:p:296-315

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Management and Enterprise Development from Inderscience Enterprises Ltd
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sarah Parker ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ids:ijmede:v:8:y:2010:i:3:p:296-315