Group lending or individual lending? Evidence from a randomised field experiment in Mongolia

Orazio Attanasio, Britta Augsburg, Ralph De Haas, Emla Fitzsimons () and Heike Harmgart ()
Additional contact information
Emla Fitzsimons: Institute for Fiscal Studies and University College London
Heike Harmgart: Institute for Fiscal Studies

No W11/20, IFS Working Papers from Institute for Fiscal Studies

Abstract: Although microfinance institutions across the world are moving from group lending towards individual lending, this strategic shift is not substantiated by sufficient empirical evidence on the impact of both types of lending on borrowers. We present such evidence from a randomised field experiment in rural Mongolia. We find a positive impact of access to group loans on food consumption and entrepreneurship. Among households that were offered group loans the likelihood of owning an enterprise increases by ten per cent more than in control villages. Enterprise profits increase over time as well, particularly for the less-educated. For individual lending on the other hand, we detect no significant increase in consumption or enterprise ownership. These results are in line with theories that stress the disciplining effect of group lending: joint liability may deter borrowers from using loans for non-investment purposes. Our results on informal transfers are consistent with this hypothesis. Borrowers in group-lending villages are less likely to make informal transfers to families and friends while borrowers in individual-lending villages are more likely to do so. We find no significant difference in repayment rates between the two lending programs, neither of which entailed weekly repayment meetings.

Keywords: Microcredit; group lending; poverty; access to finance; randomised field experiment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D21 G21 I32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011-12-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dev, nep-exp, nep-mfd and nep-tra
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (81)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp1120.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 404 Not Found (http://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp1120.pdf [301 Moved Permanently]--> https://www.ifs.org.uk/wps/wp1120.pdf [302 Found]--> https://ifs.org.uk/wps/wp1120.pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Group lending or individual lending? Evidence from a randomised field experiment in Mongolia (2014)
Working Paper: Group lending or individual lending? Evidence from a randomised field experiment in Mongolia (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ifs:ifsewp:11/20

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IFS Working Papers from Institute for Fiscal Studies The Institute for Fiscal Studies 7 Ridgmount Street LONDON WC1E 7AE. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Emma Hyman ().