EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Turning Back the Clock: Japan’s Misguided Postal Law is Back on the Table

Gary Hufbauer and Julia Muir ()
Additional contact information
Julia Muir: Peterson Institute for International Economics

No PB10-17, Policy Briefs from Peterson Institute for International Economics

Abstract: On May 31, 2010, a majority of the Lower House of the National Diet of Japan approved legislation that would reverse a decade's worth of effort to fully privatize key subsidiaries of Japan Post Holdings Co. Ltd. Besides postal services, the state-run postal system offers banking and insurance services, through Japan Post Bank (JPB) and Japan Post Insurance (JPI), respectively. These are the financial engines of Japan Post and were the units slated for privatization. Both subsidiaries have long received favorable government treatment, tilting the playing field against private banks and insurance firms, whether foreign or domestic. The government of Japan is in clear violation of its commitments under the World Trade Organization (WTO), and if the Upper House approves the legislation, Japan will reverse the efforts made by the United States and the European Union, as well as domestic private banks and insurance firms, to establish a level playing field. What's more, Japan risks having a formal WTO dispute brought against it.

Date: 2010-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cis and nep-his
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.piie.com/publications/policy-briefs/tu ... ostal-law-back-table (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb10-17

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Policy Briefs from Peterson Institute for International Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Peterson Institute webmaster ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:iie:pbrief:pb10-17