Perfection of the Jury Rule by Rule-Reforming Voters
Krishna K Ladha
Additional contact information
Krishna K Ladha: Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
No 103, Working papers from Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode
Abstract:
With no authority to change the constitution, a jury does the next best thing: it adopts the optimal rule given the constitution. At equilibrium, some jurors, called the rule reformers, vote independent of their information producing the second-best rule. The remaining jurors vote on the basis of their information enabling aggregation of the dispersed information. Arising from this asymmetric voting in a simultaneous jury game is an equivalence class of asymmetric strong Nash equilibria in pure strategies at which the information aggregation is at its best. Thus, the strategic act of rule reforming enables individual rationality to yield collective rationality. The coordination problem, as to which juror would play which role, can be solved by letting the jurors make a non-binding pre-play agreement specifying each juror’s role; the agreement is self enforcing. The results hold for any voting rule, and any costs of erroneous conviction and acquittal.
Pages: 24 pages
Date: 2012
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-cdm, nep-mic and nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://iimk.ac.in/websiteadmin/FacultyPublication ... pers/103abs.pdf?t=41 First version, 2016 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iik:wpaper:103
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Working papers from Indian Institute of Management Kozhikode IIMK Campus PO, Kunnamanagalam, Kozhikode, Kerala, India -673570. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sudheesh Kumar ().