Why plea-bargaining fails to achieve results in so many criminal justice systems: A new framework for assessment

Nuno Garoupa and Frank H Stephen ()
Additional contact information
Frank H Stephen: University of Manchester

No 2008-02, Working Papers from Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales

Abstract: The economics of plea-bargaining is largely over-optimistic and contrasts with legal scholarship on the topic. We have shown that part of the reason is that it still relies heavily on the 'efficient prosecutor' model and only recently has started looking at the possible advantages of judicial scrutiny. As a consequence, the economics of plea-bargaining has largely failed to influence the debate in Europe and around the world. Further, it was unable to predict the relative failure of Italy (and possibly France), although there is an ex post rationalization (bargaining as an inadequate solution to delays in trial rather than as a device to generate prosecutorial efficient allocation of resources). This paper proposes a new approach based on viewing the contract, which is at the heart of the plea-bargain, as being located in a wider nexus of relationships involving parties who are not directly (or effectively) represented at the bargaining table. By looking in detail to the contract between defendant and his lawyer, the role of the prosecutor, and third party effects, we have provided a richer model that is more skeptical of the efficiency of plea-bargaining. We also point out that a successful transplant of plea-bargaining from the United States to civil law jurisdictions such as France and Italy will very much depend on a reform of criminal procedure that addresses the agency costs we have identified.

Date: 2008-02-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-law
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (13)

Published in Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 15(3), September 2008: 319-354

Downloads: (external link)
http://repec.imdea.org/pdf/imdea-wp2008-02.pdf (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to repec.imdea.org:80 (A connection attempt failed because the connected party did not properly respond after a period of time, or established connection failed because connected host has failed to respond.)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:imd:wpaper:wp2008-02

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Instituto Madrileño de Estudios Avanzados (IMDEA) Ciencias Sociales Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by IMDEA RePEc Maintainer ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).