On the Validity of Value-at-Risk: Comparative Analyses with Expected Shortfall

Yasuhiro Yamai and Toshinao Yoshiba
Additional contact information
Yasuhiro Yamai: Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan
Toshinao Yoshiba: Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan

Monetary and Economic Studies, 2002, vol. 20, issue 1, 57-85

Abstract: Value-at-risk (VaR) has become a standard measure used in financial risk management due to its conceptual simplicity, computational facility, and ready applicability. However, many authors claim that VaR has several conceptual problems. Artzner et al. (1997, 1999), for example, have cited the following shortcomings of VaR. (1) VaR measures only percentiles of profit-loss distributions, and thus disregards any loss beyond the VaR level ("tail risk"), and (2) VaR is not coherent since it is not sub-additive. To alleviate the problems inherent in VaR, the use of expected shortfall is proposed. In this paper, we provide an overview of studies comparing VaR and expected shortfall to draw practical implications for financial risk management. In particular, we illustrate how tail risk can bring serious practical problems in some cases.

JEL-codes: D81 G11 G32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (26)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.imes.boj.or.jp/research/papers/english/me20-1-3.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ime:imemes:v:20:y:2002:i:1:p:57-85

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Monetary and Economic Studies from Institute for Monetary and Economic Studies, Bank of Japan Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kinken ().