Thinking about it: thoughts about health and valuing QALYs

P Dolan

Working Papers from Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School

Abstract: When valuing health states, health economists often ask respondents how many years of life in poor health they would be willing to trade off in order to live in full health. There are many problems inherent in eliciting preferences of this kind that have led us to advocate more direct measures of experienced utility. Yet individuals are often willing to make large sacrifices in life expectancy to alleviate conditions for which there is a considerable degree of hedonic adaptation. The purpose of this study is to investigate this important discrepancy in more detail. Data from 1173 internet and telephone surveys in the United States suggest that frequent and negative thoughts about health are significant in explaining time trade-off responses. We discuss some of the implications of these results for the measurement and valuation of health.

Date: 2009-05-31
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hea
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/bitstream/10044/1/146 ... nd%20feelings%27.pdf

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:imp:wpaper:1465

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Imperial College, London, Imperial College Business School Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().