Returns on R&D investment: A comprehensive survey on the magnitude and evaluation methodologies

Andreia Cardoso () and Aurora Teixeira ()
Additional contact information
Andreia Cardoso: UITT; INESC Porto

UITT Working Papers from INESC Porto, Unidade de Inovação e Transferência de Tecnologia(UITT)

Abstract: As technology and innovation seem to be contingent upon each other a great deal of attention has been given to the importance of assessing the contribution of R&D investment to firm and industry performance and, ultimately, to the economic performance of countries and regions. In industrialised societies not only private but also public agents have allocated increasing amounts of their resources to R&D activities, often considered the key path to innovativeness. At the same time, due to advances in empirical research, increasingly more focused on the micro (firms) rather than on the macro (country) level, old myths about the relationship between R&D, innovation and success began to fall down. Firstly, the idea that innovation is much broader than R&D has gained large support and has made it possible to identify other sources of innovation, beyond excellence in R&D, which had been largely hidden or neglected. As result, perceptions about small firms - or the so-called low-tech industries, which either do not carry out any significant R&D activities or are likely to perform them outside formal classifications - started to change. Secondly, the idea that more R&D investment is always automatically bond to success - whatever criteria one may choose to define success – has become nothing more than a utopia. In this paper we carry out an analysis of the literature on the magnitude and evaluation of R&D, and, possibly, of innovation. We identify the methodologies used and analyse to what extent the magnitude of (eventual) R&D returns is dependent on the methodology pursued and the level of analysis - firms (micro), industry (meso), and regions/countries (macro) - considered. We conclude that methodological approaches and levels of analysis determine, to a certain extent, the type of results obtained and, thus, variances between them.

Keywords: Innovations and R&D indicators; Methodologies; Macro, meso and micro levels; R&D payoff (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 25 pages
Date: 2009-03
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ino, nep-mic and nep-tid
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://matasetix.inescporto.pt/RePEc/pdf/09.03.19_WP1_CardosoTeixeira.pdf Full text (application/pdf)
No restriction to downloads

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inc:wpaper:2009-03-wp1

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 378, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal
http://www.inescporto.pt/uitt

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in UITT Working Papers from INESC Porto, Unidade de Inovação e Transferência de Tecnologia(UITT) Rua Dr. Roberto Frias, 378, 4200-465, Porto, Portugal.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Andreia Passos ().