Vaccine Prioritization for Effective Pandemic Response
Eva K. Lee (),
Fan Yuan (),
Ferdinand H. Pietz,
Bernard A. Benecke and
Greg Burel
Additional contact information
Eva K. Lee: Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; NSF I/UCRC Center for Health Organization Transformation, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Fan Yuan: Center for Operations Research in Medicine and HealthCare, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; NSF I/UCRC Center for Health Organization Transformation, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Atlanta, Georgia 30332; and Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Ferdinand H. Pietz: Strategic National Stockpile, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Bernard A. Benecke: Global Disease Detection and Emergency Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Greg Burel: Strategic National Stockpile, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30322
Interfaces, 2015, vol. 45, issue 5, 425-443
Abstract:
Public health experts agree that the best strategy to contain a pandemic, where vaccination is the prophylactic treatment but vaccine supply is limited, is to give higher priority to higher-risk populations. We derive a mathematical decision framework to track the effectiveness of prioritized vaccination through the course of a pandemic. Our approach couples a disease-propagation model with a vaccine queueing model and an optimization engine to determine optimal prioritized coverage in a mixed-vaccination strategy. This demonstrably minimizes infection and mortality. Given estimated outbreak characteristics, vaccine inventory levels, and individual risk factors, the study reveals an optimal coverage for the high-risk group that results in the lowest overall attack and mortality rates. This knowledge is critical to public health policy makers for determining the best strategies for population protection. This becomes particularly important in determining when to switch from a prioritized strategy emphasizing high-risk groups to a nonprioritized strategy in which the vaccine becomes available publicly. Our analysis highlights the importance of uninterrupted vaccine supply. Although the 2009 H1N1 supply, received in interrupted batches, eventually covered over 30 percent of the population, the resulting attack and mortality rates are significantly inferior to those in a scenario where only 20 percent of the population is covered with an uninterrupted supply. We also learned that early vaccination is important. Contrasting the 2009 H1N1 supply to a 10 percent uninterrupted supply, a three-week delay in vaccination reduces the 9.9 percent infection reduction of the former to a mere 0.9 percent. The optimal trigger for switching from prioritized to nonprioritized vaccination is sensitive to infectivity and vulnerability of the high-risk groups. Our study further underscores the importance of throughput efficiency in dispensing and its effects on the overall attack and mortality rates. The more transmissible the virus is, the lower the threshold for switching to nonprioritized vaccination. Our model, which can be generalized, allows the incorporation of seasonality and virus mutation of the biological agents. The system empowers policy makers to make the right decisions at the appropriate time to save more lives, better utilize limited resources, and reduce the health-service burden during a pandemic event.
Keywords: ordinary differential equations; queueing; optimization; public health policy making; pandemic containment; vaccine prioritization; disease propagation; decision support; agent-based simulation; epidemiology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/inte.2015.0814 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orinte:v:45:y:2015:i:5:p:425-443
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Interfaces from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().