EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Designing Supply Contracts: Contract Type and Information Asymmetry

Charles J. Corbett (), Deming Zhou () and Christopher S. Tang ()
Additional contact information
Charles J. Corbett: The Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481
Deming Zhou: The Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481
Christopher S. Tang: The Anderson School of Management, University of California, Los Angeles, 110 Westwood Plaza, Los Angeles, California 90095-1481

Management Science, 2004, vol. 50, issue 4, 550-559

Abstract: This paper studies the value to a supplier of obtaining better information about a buyer's cost structure, and of being able to offer more general contracts. We use the bilateral monopoly setting to analyze six scenarios: three increasingly general contracts (wholesale-pricing schemes, two-part linear schemes, and twopart nonlinear schemes), each under full and incomplete information about the buyer's cost structure. We allow both sides to refuse to trade by explicitly including reservation profit levels for both; for the supplier, this is implemented through a cutoff policy. We derive the supplier's optimal contracts and profits for all six scenarios and examine the value of information and of more general contracts. Our key findings are as follows: First, the value of information is higher under two-part contracts; second, the value of offering two-part contracts is higher under full information; and third, the proportion of buyers the supplier will choose to exclude can be substantial.

Keywords: supply chains; contracting; pricing; asymmetric information (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (164)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1030.0173 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:50:y:2004:i:4:p:550-559

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:50:y:2004:i:4:p:550-559