Investor Behavior Under Epistemic vs. Aleatory Uncertainty

Daniel J. Walters (), Gülden Ülkümen (), David Tannenbaum (), Carsten Erner () and Craig R. Fox ()
Additional contact information
Daniel J. Walters: INSEAD, Singapore 138676, Singapore
Gülden Ülkümen: Marketing, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90089
David Tannenbaum: University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah 84112
Carsten Erner: Anderson School of Management, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095
Craig R. Fox: Anderson School of Management, University of California–Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095

Management Science, 2023, vol. 69, issue 5, 2761-2777

Abstract: We provide evidence that investor behavior is sensitive to two dimensions of subjective uncertainty concerning future asset values. Investors vary in the extent to which they attribute market uncertainty to (1) missing knowledge, skill, or information (epistemic uncertainty) and (2) chance or stochastic processes (aleatory uncertainty). Investors who view stock market uncertainty as higher in epistemicness (knowability) are more likely to reduce uncertainty by seeking guidance from experts and are more responsive more responsive to available information when choosing whether to invest. In contrast, investors who view stock market uncertainty as higher in aleatoriness (randomness) are more likely to reduce uncertainty through diversification, and their risk preferences better predict whether they choose to invest. We show, further, that attributions of uncertainty can be perturbed by the format in which historical information is presented: charts displaying absolute stock prices promote perceptions of epistemicness and greater willingness to pay for financial advice, whereas charts displaying the change in stock prices from one period to the next promote perceptions of aleatoriness and a greater tendency to diversify.

Keywords: investor behavior; financial decision making; epistemic uncertainty; aleatory uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4489 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ormnsc:v:69:y:2023:i:5:p:2761-2777

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Management Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().