EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Exploration vs. Exploitation: An Empirical Test of the Ambidexterity Hypothesis

Zi-Lin He () and Poh Wong ()
Additional contact information
Zi-Lin He: Department of Management, University of Otago, P.O. Box 56, Dunedin, New Zealand

Organization Science, 2004, vol. 15, issue 4, 481-494

Abstract: While exploration and exploitation represent two fundamentally different approaches to organizational learning, recent literature has increasingly indicated the need for firms to achieve a balance between the two. This balanced view is embedded in the concept of ambidextrous organizations. However, there is little direct evidence of the positive effect of ambidexterity on firm performance. This paper seeks to test the ambidexterity hypothesis by examining how exploration and exploitation can jointly influence firm performance in the context of firms' approach to technological innovation. Based on a sample of 206 manufacturing firms, we find evidence consistent with the ambidexterity hypothesis by showing that (1) the interaction between explorative and exploitative innovation strategies is positively related to sales growth rate, and (2) the relative imbalance between explorative and exploitative innovation strategies is negatively related to sales growth rate.

Keywords: technological innovation; innovation strategy; ambidextrous organization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (674)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1040.0078 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:15:y:2004:i:4:p:481-494

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:15:y:2004:i:4:p:481-494