Organizational Structure and Performance Feedback: Centralization, Aspirations, and Termination Decisions

John Joseph (), Ronald Klingebiel () and Alex James Wilson ()
Additional contact information
John Joseph: Paul Merage School of Business, University of California, Irvine, California 92617
Ronald Klingebiel: Frankfurt School of Finance and Management, 60314 Frankfurt, Germany
Alex James Wilson: Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455

Organization Science, 2016, vol. 27, issue 5, 1065-1083

Abstract: This study examines the effects of organizational structure and performance feedback on termination decisions—in particular, product phaseout. Using quarterly product-level data on the major mobile handset manufacturers for the period 2004–2009, we analyze how product-level feedback affects product phaseout and how these decisions are conditioned by organizational structure—the extent to which decision making is centralized. We argue that such structure affects termination in two ways: directly, through coordination, and indirectly, by shaping the interpretation of performance feedback. Our baseline models indicate that as performance increases above aspirations, the rate of phaseout decreases. We find that as performance declines below aspirations, the rate of phaseout decreases, but then increases when the product falls below a certain sales threshold. We also find evidence that centralization amplifies the feedback effect above aspirations but attenuates it below aspirations. This study links two pillars of the Carnegie school, aspiration levels and hierarchy, to explain the complexity of phaseout following perceived success or failure. We thereby augment the growing scholarship on performance feedback by considering some important conditional effects imposed by a centralized structure. Our focus on centralization expands the scope of theory concerning organization design by linking structure and cognition to explain firm behavior, especially termination decisions.

Keywords: organizational structure; behavioral theory of the firm; performance feedback; organizational design; organization and management theory (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (42)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2016.1076 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:27:y:2016:i:5:p:1065-1083

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().