EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Cooperative Versus Competitive Structures in Related and Unrelated Diversified Firms

Charles W. L. Hill, Michael A. Hitt and Robert E. Hoskisson
Additional contact information
Charles W. L. Hill: Department of Management and Organization, Schools of Business, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
Michael A. Hitt: Department of Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843
Robert E. Hoskisson: Department of Management, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843

Organization Science, 1992, vol. 3, issue 4, 501-521

Abstract: Herein we argue that different diversification strategies are associated with different sets of economic benefits. Firms that have diversified into related areas can realize benefits from economies of scope, while those that have diversified into unrelated areas can realize benefits from efficient internal governance mechanisms. We hypothesize that distinctly different internal organizational arrangements are required to realize these different benefits. Firms attempting to realize economies of scope need organizational arrangements that stress cooperation between business units. Firms attempting to realize economic benefits from efficient internal governance need organizational arrangements that stress competition between business units. If a diversified firm is to achieve high performance it must establish an appropriate fit between its diversification strategy on the one hand, and its organizational structure and control systems on the other. We test this thesis on 184 Fortune 1000 firms that participated in a survey of organizational arrangements. The results indicate that the appropriate fit between strategy, structure, and control systems is associated with superior performance. Firms attempting to realize economies of scope perform better if their organizational arrangements stress cooperation between business units, while firms attempting to realize economic benefits from efficient internal governance perform better if their organizational arrangements stress competition between business units.

Keywords: diversification strategy; organizational structure and economic performance (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1992
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (86)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.4.501 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:3:y:1992:i:4:p:501-521

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Organization Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:ororsc:v:3:y:1992:i:4:p:501-521