EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Disruptive Entrepreneurship and Dual Purpose Strategies: The Case of Uber

David P. Baron ()
Additional contact information
David P. Baron: Graduate School of Business, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305

Strategy Science, 2018, vol. 3, issue 2, 439-462

Abstract: Uber provides a two-sided platform that matches travelers with drivers who choose when, where, and how long to drive using their own vehicles. Uber disrupts local markets with an incumbent taxi industry, and the industry fights back in both its market and institutional environments. This paper focuses on Uber’s strategy for addressing the challenges from the taxi industry with an emphasis on dual-purpose strategies that provide in a complementary manner benefits both in the marketplace and in the institutional environment. The focus is on three issues important to Uber’s success. The first is whether Uber is a platform company or a transportation service that falls under the jurisdiction of local regulators. The second is whether Uber drivers are classified under the law as independent contractors or as employees. The third is passenger safety and the qualifications required for ride-hailing drivers. The corresponding dual-purpose strategies considered are market engagement, work enhancement, and accommodation. Implementing these dual-purpose strategies involves lobbying, stakeholder mobilization, and institutional venue shifting. A model of a local transportation market is presented as a framework for analyzing market competition and for identifying the incentives of market and institutional participants, including Uber, its drivers and passengers, taxi companies and their drivers, and safety advocates, to challenge or support Uber and ride-hailing. The model distinguishes between full-time and part-time drivers, frequent and infrequent travelers, and whether taxi drivers or taxi companies own the taxi medallions.

Keywords: dual purpose strategies; Uber; institutional environment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1287/stsc.2018.0059 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:439-462

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Strategy Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:3:y:2018:i:2:p:439-462