 Category Strategy for Firm AdvantageElizabeth G. Pontikes ()
Strategy Science, 2018, vol. 3, issue 4, 620-631 Abstract: The decision of where to position in a market is crucial to firm success. Most strategy research focuses on either choosing an attractive industry or firm-level differences that lead to sustained advantage. In both approaches, how the industry or submarket is defined is typically taken as an exogenous constraint. But firms also can shape market categories in ways that advantage the firm. In this article, I draw on research in strategy, sociology, and cognitive science to show category strategy is foundational to strategic decisions around competitive positioning. Cognitively, the market categories people use define the playing field for firms, as they partially determine competitive sets and evaluation standards. Sociologically, definitions of market categories are subject to social influence. This means strategic decisions about how to position within the market affect how market categories are defined and evolve, which firms can (and should) use to achieve long-term value. Keywords: category strategy; strategic decisions; market positioning; competitive positioning; categories; cognition (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:orstsc:v:3:y:2018:i:4:p:620-631 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Strategy Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.