Managing Inventory in Global Supply Chains Facing Port-of-Entry Disruption Risks
Brian M. Lewis (),
Alan L. Erera (),
Maciek A. Nowak () and
White Chelsea C. ()
Additional contact information
Brian M. Lewis: Vanguard Software Corporation, Cary, North Carolina 27518
Alan L. Erera: School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Maciek A. Nowak: Information Systems and Operations Management, Graduate School of Business, Loyola University, Chicago, Illinois 60611
White Chelsea C.: School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
Transportation Science, 2013, vol. 47, issue 2, 162-180
Abstract:
Ports-of-entry are critical components of the modern international supply chain infrastructure, particularly container seaports and airfreight hubs. The potential operational and economic impact resulting from their temporary closure is unknown but is widely believed to be very significant. This paper investigates one aspect of this potential impact, focusing specifically on the use of supply chain inventory as a risk mitigation strategy for a one supplier, one customer system in which goods are transported through a port-of-entry subject to temporary closures. Closure likelihood and duration are modeled using a completely observed, exogenous Markov chain. Order lead times are dependent on the status of the port-of-entry, including potential congestion backlogs of unprocessed work. An infinite-horizon, periodic-review inventory control model is developed to determine the optimal average cost ordering policies under linear ordering costs with backlogged demand. When congestion is negligible, the optimal policy is state invariant. In the more complex case of nonnegligible congestion, this result no longer holds. For studied scenarios, numerical results indicate that operating margins may decrease 10% for reasonable-length port-of-entry closures, that margins may be eliminated completely without contingency plans, and that expected holding and penalty costs may increase 20% for anticipated increases in port-of-entry utilization.
Keywords: supply chain risk; inventory management; seaport operations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (14)
Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1120.0406 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inm:ortrsc:v:47:y:2013:i:2:p:162-180
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Transportation Science from INFORMS Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chris Asher ().