How do people interpret macroeconomic shocks? Evidence from U.S. survey data

Martin Geiger () and Johann Scharler

Working Papers from Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck

Abstract: We study the revision of survey expectations in response to macroeconomic shocks, which we identify in vector autoregressive models with sign restrictions. We find that survey respondents distinguish between movements along the Phillips curve and shifts of the Phillips curve, depending on the type of the shock that hits the economy. In addition, expectations about future interest rate dynamics are revised broadly in line with a Taylor rule. While the macroeconomic shocks account only for a small share of the forecast error variance of survey measures elicited from consumers, they are more relevant for the expectations of professional forecasters. This result is consistent with models of rational inattention.

Keywords: Macroeconomic Expectations; Michigan Survey; Structural Vector Autoregression; Zero and Sign Restrictions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D84 E00 E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50 pages
Date: 2018-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-mac and nep-upt
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://www2.uibk.ac.at/downloads/c4041030/wpaper/2018-12.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: How Do People Interpret Macroeconomic Shocks? Evidence from U.S. Survey Data (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inn:wpaper:2018-12

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Judith Courian ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).