Social rate of return: A new tool for evaluating social programs

Nanak Kakwani and Hyun H. Son
Additional contact information
Nanak Kakwani: University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
Hyun H. Son: Asian Development Bank, Manila, Philippines

No 383, Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality

Abstract: This study proposes the method of social rate of return (SRR) to evaluate safety net programs such as conditional cash transfer (CCT) schemes. Two types of SRRs are derived in the study: one based on the poverty social welfare function that focuses on the poorest 20\% of the population and the other based on the Gini social welfare function that focuses on inequality as measured by Gini. Defined as the social welfare generated by a program as a percentage of the cost of the program, the SRR is used in this study to conduct a comparative evaluation of CCT programs in Brazil ({\it Bolsa Familia} Program) and the Philippines ({\it Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino} Program or 4Ps). The findings reveal that the targeting of {\it Bolsa Familia} has improved substantially during 2001–2012, with the poor comprising almost two-thirds of the beneficiaries in 2012. Meanwhile, the 4Ps has rapidly expanded to cover 21\% of the population in 2013, but at the expense of increased leakage of beneficiaries from 45.33\% in 2011 to 52.20\% in 2013. The study finds that both programs have become more efficient in alleviating poverty and inequality – albeit {\it Bolsa Familia} is deemed more efficient given its better targeting system and lower operational cost. Nevertheless, the 4Ps’ targeting efficiency and administrative costs associated with the delivery of transfers have improved within a short period. The findings also indicate that both programs contribute more to the reduction in poverty than inequality.

Keywords: Social rate of return; Gini social welfare function; poverty social welfare function; inequality; targeting; beneficiary and benefit analysis; cost effectiveness; poverty; education; conditional cash transfer program; Bolsa Familia; Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program; social assistance. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: D61 D63 I24 I32 I38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 46 pages
Date: 2015-11
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-dem, nep-dev and nep-sea
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ecineq.org/milano/WP/ECINEQ2015-383.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:inq:inqwps:ecineq2015-383

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from ECINEQ, Society for the Study of Economic Inequality Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Maria Ana Lugo ( this e-mail address is bad, please contact ).