EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Traditional or social media: which capture employment better?

Marija Hruska (mlogarusic@efzg.hr) and Mirjana Cizmesija (mcizmesija@efzg.hr)
Additional contact information
Marija Hruska: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Statistics, Zagreb, Croatia
Mirjana Cizmesija: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Statistics, Zagreb, Croatia

Public Sector Economics, 2024, vol. 48, issue 4, 399-419

Abstract: Political discourse has the ability to spread either uncertainty or calm among the population. Economic upheavals of considerable magnitude can also spread ambiguity. Both newspaper articles and Twitter posts reflect important events that have the potential to increase or decrease uncertainty from a citizen’s perspective. We employ two measures of media uncertainty, one reflecting the uncertainty perceived by journalists and the other characterizing the uncertainty associated with Twitter users. More specifically, we use the Twitter Economic Uncertainty and the Economic Policy Uncertainty Index. To investigate which uncertainty source better captures employment variations, we apply a regression decision tree and linear regression. Our results speak in favour of the more traditional media uncertainty source. Linear regression outperforms the decision tree in both models. Namely, we find a statistically significant negative relationship between both uncertainty measures and employment, while controlling for other macroeconomic aspects.

Keywords: economic policy uncertainty; employment; machine learning; decision tree; Twitter economic uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C19 C49 D81 E69 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://pse-journal.hr/upload/files/pse/2024/4/Trad ... mployment_better.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ipf:psejou:v:48:y:2024:i:4:p:399-419

DOI: 10.3326/pse.48.4.2

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Public Sector Economics from Institute of Public Finance Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Martina Fabris (fabris@ijf.hr).

 
Page updated 2025-01-04
Handle: RePEc:ipf:psejou:v:48:y:2024:i:4:p:399-419