Strategic accounting choice around firm level labour negotiations

Ana María Sabater (), Araceli Mora () and Beatriz Garcia Osma
Additional contact information
Ana María Sabater: Universidad de Alicante
Araceli Mora: Universitat de València

Working Papers. Serie EC from Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie)

Abstract: We study accounting choice around firm-level collective agreement negotiations. Prior literature argues that managers make income-decreasing accounting choices to limit the concessions made to trade unions. However, empirical research to date fails to find evidence in support of this hypothesis. We expect that this lack of evidence is driven by the confounding effects of (i) methodological concerns and (ii) influential institutional factors. Using a sample of US firms that engage in firm-level labor bargaining during the period 1994-2007, we study whether managers act strategically in an attempt to reduce the proportion of firm wealth that is accrued to employees. Our findings suggest that managers take real rather than accounting actions to minimize payments. In particular, we find evidence consistent with (i) managerial strategic timing of the negotiation, and with (ii) increased conditional conservatism in the year of labor bargaining. We do not find evidence of earnings manipulation. This potentially signals that accounting choice around labor negotiations is informative rather than opportunistic. Keywords: accounting choice, earnings quality, collective bargaining. En el presente trabajo se estudia la elección de políticas contables en torno a la negociación de convenios colectivos. La literatura previa predice que los gerentes tratan de reducir el resultado contable para minimizar las concesiones realizadas a los sindicatos. Sin embargo, no hay evidencia empírica clara hasta la fecha que ratifique esta hipótesis. Esperamos que esta falta de evidencia se justifique por (i) problemas metodológicos de estudios previos, y (ii) la influencia de factores institucionales. Empleando una muestra de empresas de EEUU que negocian un convenio colectivo entre 1994 y 2007, se estudia si los gerentes actúan estratégicamente para reducir el porcentaje de renta empresarial que se transfiere a los trabajadores. Nuestros resultados sugieren que los gerentes se valen de decisiones operativas en lugar de contables para minimizar los pagos a empleados. En particular, encontramos evidencia de (i) elección estratégica de cuándo negociar, y (ii) mayor conservadurismo contable en el año del evento. No encontramos evidencia de gestión oportunista del resultado, lo que potencialmente indica que las decisiones contables en torno a la negociación colectiva son informativas.

Keywords: elección contable; calidad del resultado; negociación colectiva (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J30 J51 M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 32 pages
Date: 2010-09
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-acc and nep-bec
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Published by Ivie

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.ivie.es/downloads/docs/wpasec/wpasec-2010-09.pdf Fisrt version / Primera version, 2010 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ivi:wpasec:2010-09

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers. Serie EC from Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas, S.A. (Ivie) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Departamento de Edición ().