Introducing co-composting to fecal sludge treatment plants in Benin and Burkina Faso: a logistical and financial assessment

Josiane Nikiema, R. Tanoh-Nguessan, F. Abiola and Olufunke O. Cofie
Additional contact information
Josiane Nikiema: International Water Management Institute (IWMI)
Olufunke O. Cofie: International Water Management Institute (IWMI)

No H049802, Resource Recovery and Reuse Series from International Water Management Institute

Abstract: Based on primary data from fecal sludge (FS) treatment plants in three West African urban regions (Ouagadougou in Burkina Faso, Greater Accra in Ghana, and Grand Nokou in Benin), FS collection and treatment patterns were analyzed to identify possible scenarios for resource recovery (RR) through FS co-composting. FS collection was analyzed for up to 7 years, in part per day, month and season, as well as FS characteristics to understand peak flows, FS qualities and related variations to plan for appropriate RR technology and capacities. Overall, the FS volumes collected by vacuum trucks were not significantly affected by the calendar days, months or seasons. Commonly assumed increases during rainy months were, for example, only recorded in Ouagadougou. FS composition appeared highly variable with a pronounced difference in total solids between FS collected from households versus institutional sources, likely indicating that institutions are served more frequently. The analyzed treatment plants appear to be exploited beyond their capacity. RR for reuse can turn sludge disposal from a cost into a source of revenue with co-benefits for farmers and the environment, thereby reducing the pressure on tipping fees. The probability of the added co-compost production being financially viable on its own was estimated for all the study sites, indicating an earliest breakeven point after 5 to 8 years.

Keywords: Resource; recovery; Resource; management; Reuse; Faecal; sludge; Waste; treatment; Solid; wastes; Treatment; plants; Composting; Logistics; Economic; analysis; Waste; management; Waste; collection; Sewerage; Recycling; Waste; disposal; Sludge; dewatering; Anaerobic; treatment; Septic; tanks; Sanitation; Technology; Maintenance; Public-private; partnerships; Investment; Business; models; Cost; recovery; Production; costs; Operating; costs; Marketing; Cost; benefit; analysis; Land; use; Urban; areas; Households (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 50 pages
Date: 2020
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-env and nep-isf
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.5337/2020.206 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iwt:rerere:h049802

DOI: 10.5337/2020.206

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Resource Recovery and Reuse Series from International Water Management Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Chandima Gunadasa ().