Bias in the Legal Profession: Self-Assessed versus Statistical Measures of Discrimination

Heather Antecol (), Deborah Cobb-Clark and Eric Helland ()
Additional contact information
Heather Antecol: Claremont McKenna College
Eric Helland: Claremont McKenna College

No 5831, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Abstract: Legal cases are generally won or lost on the basis of statistical discrimination measures, but it is workers' perceptions of discriminatory behavior that are important for understanding many labor-supply decisions. Workers who believe that they have been discriminated against are more likely to subsequently leave their employers and it is almost certainly workers' perceptions of discrimination that drive formal complaints to the EEOC. Yet the relationship between statistical and self-assessed measures of discrimination is far from obvious. We expand on the previous literature by using data from the After the JD (AJD) study to compare standard Blinder-Oaxaca measures of earnings discrimination to self-reported measures of (i) client discrimination; (ii) other work-related discrimination; and (iii) harassment. Overall, our results indicate that conventional measures of earnings discrimination are not closely linked to the racial and gender bias that new lawyers believe they have experience on the job. Statistical earnings discrimination is only occasionally related to increases in self-assessed bias and when it is the effects are very small. Moreover, statistical earnings discrimination does not explain the disparity in self-assessed bias across gender and racial groups.

Keywords: gender and racial bias; lawyers; labor market discrimination; wages (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J15 J16 J44 J71 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 40 pages
Date: 2011-07
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-lab and nep-lma
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Published - published in: Journal of Legal Studies, 2014, 43(2), 323-357

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp5831.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Bias in the Legal Profession: Self-Assessed versus Statistical Measures of Discrimination (2014)
Working Paper: Bias in the Legal Profession: Self-Assessed versus Statistical Measures of Discrimination (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp5831

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().