What Methods May Be Used in Impact Evaluations of Humanitarian Assistance?

Jyotsna Puri (), Anastasia Aladysheva, Vegard Iversen (), Yashodhan Ghorpade and Tilman Brück
Additional contact information
Jyotsna Puri: International Initiative for Impact Evaluation (3ie)
Vegard Iversen: University of Greenwich

No 8755, IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA)

Abstract: Despite the widespread occurrence of humanitarian emergencies such as epidemics, earthquakes, droughts, floods and violent conflict and despite the significant financial resources devoted to humanitarian assistance, systematic learning from such interventions using rigorous theory-based impact evaluations is very rare. The objective of this paper is to examine the extent to which scientific impact evaluation methods can provide evidence to improve the effectiveness and efficiency in humanitarian action. This paper explores the methodological options and challenges associated with generating high quality evidence needed to answer key questions about the performance of humanitarian assistance, including whether assistance is reaching the right people, at the right time, is bringing about the desired changes in their lives (effectiveness) and is being delivered in the right doses, ways and with manageable costs (efficiency). With the help of six case studies and drawing on real-life examples from the small but growing academic literature, we demonstrate how impact evaluation methods can be used successfully and in an ethical manner to improve humanitarian assistance. A key lesson from our review is that it pays to be prepared. Much information is being collected these days about the risks of various emergencies unfolding, be they sudden onset or slow onset emergencies. Hence national actors and international donors can prepare for these events and for conducting meaningful impact evaluations. Given the overwhelming needs and the lack of funds, doing more with limited resources is a key challenge for humanitarian assistance and impact evaluation is one way of achieving this.

Keywords: reconstruction; impact evaluation; methodology; research design; statistics; humanitarian emergency; humanitarian assistance; disaster; violent conflict; aid; development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C93 H84 O12 Q54 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 88 pages
Date: 2015-01
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ppm
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Published - published as: 'Can Rigorous Impact Evaluations Improve Humanitarian Assistance?' in: Journal of Development Effectiveness , 2017, 9 (4), 519 - 542.

Downloads: (external link)
https://docs.iza.org/dp8755.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izadps:dp8755

Ordering information: This working paper can be ordered from
IZA, Margard Ody, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in IZA Discussion Papers from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Holger Hinte ().