The minimum wage versus the earned income tax credit for reducing poverty

Richard Burkhauser

IZA World of Labor, 2015, No 153, 153

Abstract: Minimum wage increases are not an effective mechanism for reducing poverty. And there is little causal evidence that they do so. Most workers who gain from minimum wage increases do not live in poor (or near-poor) families, while some who do live in poor families lose their job as a result of such increases. The earned income tax credit is an effective way to reduce poverty. It raises only the after-tax wage rates of workers in low- and moderate-income families, its tax credit increases with the number of dependent children, and evidence shows that it increases labor force participation and employment in these families.

Keywords: minimum wage; earned income tax credit; working poor (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: I32 I38 J23 J39 J88 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
http://wol.iza.org/articles/minimum-wage-versus-ea ... ducing-poverty-1.pdf (application/pdf)
http://wol.iza.org/articles/minimum-wage-versus-ea ... for-reducing-poverty (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: The minimum wage versus the earned income tax credit for reducing poverty (2021)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:iza:izawol:journl:y:2015:n:153

Access Statistics for this article

IZA World of Labor is currently edited by Pierre Cahuc

More articles in IZA World of Labor from Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) IZA, P.O. Box 7240, D-53072 Bonn, Germany. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Institute of Labor Economics (IZA) ().