A suggested framework for classifying the modes of cycle research

Adrian Pagan and Don Harding

Journal of Applied Econometrics, 2005, vol. 20, issue 2, 151-159

Abstract: The paper argues that it is important to realize that the concept of a cycle has rarely been precisely articulated in empirical work and that often researchers are using very different definitions of it. We propose a two-fold classification based upon what series one is measuring a cycle in and how one would recognize a cycle in such a series. The paper illustrates how one can then categorize existing research based upon how it answers these questions. It also shows that the existence and properties of a cycle differ greatly depending upon which of the categories the researcher is using. Copyright © 2005 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (77)

Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1002/jae.838 Link to full text; subscription required (text/html)
http://qed.econ.queensu.ca:80/jae/2005-v20.2/ Supporting data files and programs (text/html)

Related works:
Journal Article: A suggested framework for classifying the modes of cycle research (2005)
Working Paper: A suggested framework for classifying the modes of cycle research (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jae:japmet:v:20:y:2005:i:2:p:151-159

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www3.intersci ... e.jsp?issn=0883-7252

DOI: 10.1002/jae.838

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Applied Econometrics is currently edited by M. Hashem Pesaran

More articles in Journal of Applied Econometrics from John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Wiley-Blackwell Digital Licensing () and Christopher F. Baum ().