EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Augmenting Bottom-up Metamodels with Predicates

Ross Gore (), Saikou Diallo (), Christopher Lynch () and Jose Padilla ()
Additional contact information
Ross Gore: https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=Sp4pikIAAAAJ
Saikou Diallo: http://www.vmasc.odu.edu/diallo.html
Christopher Lynch: http://www.vmasc.odu.edu/lynch.html
Jose Padilla: http://www.vmasc.odu.edu/padilla.html

Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation, 2017, vol. 20, issue 1, 4

Abstract: Metamodeling refers to modeling a model. There are two metamodeling approaches for ABMs: (1) top-down and (2) bottom-up. The top down approach enables users to decompose high-level mental models into behaviors and interactions of agents. In contrast, the bottom-up approach constructs a relatively small, simple model that approximates the structure and outcomes of a dataset gathered from the runs of an ABM. The bottom-up metamodel makes behavior of the ABM comprehensible and exploratory analyses feasible. For most users the construction of a bottom-up metamodel entails: (1) creating an experimental design, (2) running the simulation for all cases specified by the design, (3) collecting the inputs and output in a dataset and (4) applying first-order regression analysis to find a model that effectively estimates the output. Unfortunately, the sums of input variables employed by first-order regression analysis give the impression that one can compensate for one component of the system by improving some other component even if such substitution is inadequate or invalid. As a result the metamodel can be misleading. We address these deficiencies with an approach that: (1) automatically generates Boolean conditions that highlight when substitutions and tradeoffs among variables are valid and (2) augments the bottom-up metamodel with the conditions to improve validity and accuracy. We evaluate our approach using several established agent-based simulations.

Keywords: Metamodel; Agent-Based Simulation; Statistical Modeling; Predicates; Validation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017-01-31
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://www.jasss.org/20/1/4/4.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jas:jasssj:2015-91-4

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation from Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Francesco Renzini ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:jas:jasssj:2015-91-4