Ethical strategy focus and mutual fund management: performance and persistence

Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez (), Amparo Soler-Domínguez () and Emili Tortosa-Ausina
Additional contact information
Juan Carlos Matallín-Sáez: Department of Finance & Accounting, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain
Amparo Soler-Domínguez: Department of Finance & Accounting, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón, Spain

No 2016/01, Working Papers from Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain)

Abstract: Over the last few years academics and practitioners alike have been analyzing the relative performance of different types of mutual funds, with a particular emphasis on comparing the performance of conventional versus socially responsible investment (SRI). The methods and samples used, as well as the results obtained are diverse, but they generally point to the difficulties found by SRI to yield an equivalent performance as that of its conventional peers—given the investment constraints they face. In this study we focus on the comparative performance of a sample of SRI funds, which we decompose mainly into Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG), environmental, and religious, and which invest in three different geographical areas. For these funds we measure not only performance but, more importantly, their persistence—i.e., whether the best (worst) funds are past winners (losers) as well. This twofold objective turns out to be essential to uncover some trends in the industry. Specifically, whereas ESG, in general, outperform their environmental peers, a deeper scrutiny focusing also on performance persistence reveals that this claim should be tempered, since investing in the best past environmental funds yields superior performance than investing in the best past ESG funds. This result, which holds for the two main geographical regions analyzed (Europe and US/Canada), would indicate that the comparison between these two types of funds is more intricate than what we might a priori expect, being particularly relevant to factor in the comparison an evaluation of performance persistence.

Keywords: environmental; ESG; mutual fund; performance; persistence; SRI (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: G2 N25 Z12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 35 pages
Date: 2016
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-hme
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.doctreballeco.uji.es/wpficheros/Matallin_et_al_01_2016.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:jau:wpaper:2016/01

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Economics Department, Universitat Jaume I, Castellón (Spain) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by María Aurora Garcia Gallego ().