Expert opinion in a tort litigation game
Yves Oytana and
Nathalie Chappe
Additional contact information
Nathalie Chappe: Univ. Bourgogne Franche-Comté
European Journal of Law and Economics, 2018, vol. 46, issue 1, No 3, 67-107
Abstract:
Abstract We investigate the potential impact of various proposed reforms intended both to improve the quality of expert testimony, while reducing its cost and facilitating the work of courts in appointing experts and reading their reports. We present a unilateral care model under strict liability, in which the court cannot perfectly observe the amount of harm a tortfeasor has caused to a victim. However, the judge may appoint an expert to improve his chance of reaching a correct decision. In this context, we find that the likelihood of a victim filing a lawsuit decreases with the quality of the expert testimony and with the cost of the expertise procedure. The chances of filing increases with the non-monetary cost for the judge to appoint an expert. Moreover, we find that the effects of these parameters on the injurer’s level of precaution are ambiguous. We also find that the injurer’s level of care is suboptimal. Finally, we suggest some public policy recommendations in order to (1) increase the injurer’s level of care and (2) reduce the expected cost of a trial in the event of an accident. We find that policy makers face a trade-off between these two objectives.
Keywords: Litigation; Expert; Expert testimony; Liability (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K40 K41 K49 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10657-018-9584-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
Working Paper: Expert opinion in a tort litigation game (2016)
Working Paper: Expert opinion in a tort litigation game (2016)
Working Paper: Expert opinion in a tort litigation game (2016)
Working Paper: Expert opinion in a tort litigation game (2016)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:ejlwec:v:46:y:2018:i:1:d:10.1007_s10657-018-9584-9
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer.com/journal/10657
DOI: 10.1007/s10657-018-9584-9
Access Statistics for this article
European Journal of Law and Economics is currently edited by Jürgen Georg Backhaus, Giovanni B. Ramello and Alain Marciano
More articles in European Journal of Law and Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla (sonal.shukla@springer.com) and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (indexing@springernature.com).