Catastrophic Damages and the Optimal Carbon Tax Under Loss Aversion
Dominika Czyz () and
Karolina Safarzynska
Additional contact information
Dominika Czyz: Warsaw School of Economics
Environmental & Resource Economics, 2023, vol. 85, issue 2, No 1, 303-340
Abstract:
Abstract Recently, economists have begun to incorporate tipping points and catastrophic events into economy-climate models. It has been shown that the inclusion of tipping points amplifies the economic impacts of climate change and leads to much higher estimates of the social cost of carbon compared to the model that includes only non-catastrophic damages. All the estimates under catastrophic damages come from studies that assume full rationality. However, there is ample evidence that consumers exhibit loss aversion, meaning that they feel losses more strongly than equivalent gains. In this paper, we derive the optimal carbon tax in the Ramsey model under loss aversion and tipping points. We calibrate the model to generate a similar rate of return on capital, and thus pathways of capital and consumption, as a model with rational consumers in the business-as-usual scenario. We find that such a calibrated model generates an optimal carbon tax that is about three times higher than in the model with rational consumers in the optimal (OPT) scenario. A catastrophic event, which reduces the productivity of capital, results in a greater utility loss of loss-averse consumers compared to rational consumers. The optimal tax makes loss-averse consumers increase their precautionary savings before the shock, smoothing their consumption, which reduces welfare loss after the catastrophic event.
Keywords: Carbon tax; Loss aversion; Social cost of carbon; Climate tipping; Precautionary capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10640-023-00768-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to the full text of the articles in this series is restricted.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:enreec:v:85:y:2023:i:2:d:10.1007_s10640-023-00768-4
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... al/journal/10640/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-023-00768-4
Access Statistics for this article
Environmental & Resource Economics is currently edited by Ian J. Bateman
More articles in Environmental & Resource Economics from Springer, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().