Valuing mortality risk in China: Comparing stated-preference estimates from 2005 and 2016
James Hammitt,
Fangli Geng,
Xiaoqi Guo and
Chris P. Nielsen
Additional contact information
Fangli Geng: Harvard University
Xiaoqi Guo: Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Chris P. Nielsen: Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2019, vol. 58, issue 2, No 4, 167-186
Abstract:
Abstract We estimate the marginal rate of substitution of income for reduction in current annual mortality risk (the “value per statistical life” or VSL) using stated-preference surveys administered to independent samples of the general population of Chengdu, China in 2005 and 2016. We evaluate the quality of estimates by the theoretical criteria that willingness to pay (WTP) for risk reduction should be strictly positive and nearly proportional to the magnitude of the risk reduction (evaluated by comparing answers between respondents) and test the effect of excluding respondents whose answers violate these criteria. For subsamples of respondents that satisfy the criteria, point estimates of the sensitivity of WTP to risk reduction are consistent with theory and yield estimates of VSL that are two to three times larger than estimated using the full samples. Between 2005 and 2016, estimated VSL increased sharply, from about 22,000 USD in 2005 to 550,000 USD in 2016. Income also increased substantially over this period. Attributing the change in VSL solely to the change in real income implies an income elasticity of about 3.0. Our results suggest that estimates of VSL from stated-preference studies in which WTP is not close to proportionate to the stated risk reduction may be biased downward by a factor of two or more, and that VSL is likely to grow rapidly in a population with strong economic growth, which implies that environmental-health, safety, and other policies should become increasingly protective.
Keywords: Value of statistical life; Stated preference; Willingness to pay; China; D61; H43; I18; Q51 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (16)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11166-019-09305-5 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
Working Paper: Valuing Mortality Risk in China: Comparing Stated-Preference Estimates from 2005 and 2016 (2019) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:58:y:2019:i:2:d:10.1007_s11166-019-09305-5
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11166/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-019-09305-5
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty is currently edited by W. Kip Viscusi
More articles in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().