Chance theory: A separation of riskless and risky utility
Ulrich Schmidt and
Horst Zank ()
Additional contact information
Ulrich Schmidt: Kiel Institute for the World Economy
Horst Zank: School of Social Sciences, The University of Manchester
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2022, vol. 65, issue 1, No 1, 32 pages
Abstract:
Abstract In a temporal context, sure outcomes may yield higher utility than risky ones as they are available for the execution of plans before the resolution of uncertainty. By observing a disproportionate preference for certainty, empirical research points to a fundamental difference between riskless and risky utility. Chance Theory (CT) accounts for this difference and, in contrast to earlier approaches to separate risky and riskless utility, does not violate basic rationality principles like first-order stochastic dominance or transitivity. CT evaluates the lowest outcome of an act with the riskless utility v and the increments over that outcome, called chances, by subjective expected utility (EU) with a risky utility u. As a consequence of treating sure outcomes differently to risky ones, CT is able to explain the EU-paradoxes of Allais (Econometrica, 21(4): 503–546, 1953) that rely on the certainty effect, and also the critique to EU put forward by Rabin (Econometrica, 68(5): 1281–1292, 2000). Moreover, CT separates risk attitudes in the strong sense, captured entirely by u, from attitude towards wealth reflected solely through the curvature ofv.
Keywords: Expected utility; Riskless utility for wealth; Risky utility for money; Preference foundation; Prudence; C78; C91; D81; D90 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11166-022-09385-w Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:jrisku:v:65:y:2022:i:1:d:10.1007_s11166-022-09385-w
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ry/journal/11166/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11166-022-09385-w
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Risk and Uncertainty is currently edited by W. Kip Viscusi
More articles in Journal of Risk and Uncertainty from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().