Defining the ‘Resource Unit’ for Poverty Measurement in Complex Contemporary Households: It’s Complicated

Lawrence Berger (), Maria Cancian (), Marcia J. Carlson (), Daniel R. Meyer (), Quentin Riser () and Nora Cate Schaeffer ()
Additional contact information
Lawrence Berger: University of Wisconsin-Madison
Maria Cancian: Georgetown University
Marcia J. Carlson: University of Wisconsin-Madison
Daniel R. Meyer: University of Wisconsin-Madison
Quentin Riser: University of Wisconsin-Madison
Nora Cate Schaeffer: University of Wisconsin-Madison

Population Research and Policy Review, 2024, vol. 43, issue 2, No 9, 30 pages

Abstract: Abstract Determining whether a household is ‘in poverty,’ requires identifying a resource unit, typically consisting of individuals who both co-reside and pool resources. High levels of family complexity and fluidity in living arrangements among contemporary American families, particularly those that include children, have complicated this task. We leverage novel survey data from Wisconsin to examine the implications of a range of alternative criteria for identifying the resource unit used to measure poverty. We further consider the extent to which unit members, under alternative criteria, exchange food-related resources both within and outside of the unit. Our results reveal inconsistencies between alternative measures of the resource unit and those used to define the resource unit for the Official Poverty Measure (OPM) and Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) in the United States, and we find that the SPM unit is generally more consistent than the OPM unit with alternative measures of the resource unit. In addition, we find substantial levels of food resource exchanges among adults who are both inside and outside the resource unit. Together, these findings demonstrate the challenge of appropriately defining the resource unit for measuring poverty and suggest that both the OPM and SPM may not fully account for the availability, amount, or composition of resources for many households.

Keywords: Families and households; Cohabitation; Poverty; Living arrangements; Resource units (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11113-024-09864-9 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:poprpr:v:43:y:2024:i:2:d:10.1007_s11113-024-09864-9

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... es/journal/11113/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11113-024-09864-9

Access Statistics for this article

Population Research and Policy Review is currently edited by D.A. Swanson

More articles in Population Research and Policy Review from Springer, Southern Demographic Association (SDA)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().