Weak versus strong net neutrality: correction and clarification
Joshua Gans and
Michael Katz ()
Journal of Regulatory Economics, 2016, vol. 50, issue 1, No 4, 99-110
Abstract:
Abstract We correct and clarify the results of Gans (J Regul Econ 47:183–200, 2015) regarding the effects of net neutrality regulation on equilibrium outcomes in settings where a content provider sells its services to consumers for a fee. We examine both pricing and investment effects. We extend the earlier paper’s result that weak forms of net neutrality are ineffective and also show that even a strong form of net neutrality may be ineffective. In addition, we demonstrate that, when strong net neutrality does affect the equilibrium outcome, it may harm efficiency by distorting both ISP and content provider investment and service-quality choices.
Keywords: Regulation; Net neutrality; Internet service providers; Content providers; Infrastructure investment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C63 D4 D42 D43 L1 L12 L13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)
Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11149-016-9305-7 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:regeco:v:50:y:2016:i:1:d:10.1007_s11149-016-9305-7
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/11149/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11149-016-9305-7
Access Statistics for this article
Journal of Regulatory Economics is currently edited by Menaham Spiegel
More articles in Journal of Regulatory Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().