Did Hayek have a monetary theory of business cycles?
Gerald O’Driscoll () and
Douglas Rasmussen
The Review of Austrian Economics, 2012, vol. 25, issue 3, 255-262
Abstract:
Joseph Schumpeter, a careful reader of Hayek, categorized Hayek’s theory of economic cycles as non-monetary. Almost every other source, including Hayek himself, categorized the theory as monetary. The issue turns on the concept of causality being used. The question of what causality concept to apply to complex phenomena has substantive implications for economic theory. A simple concept of causality, appropriate to the study of some physical phenomena, will mislead when applied to complex phenomena. We provide examples of errors in analysis that follow from the wrong choice of a causal paradigm. Copyright Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2012
Keywords: Money; Cycles; Causality; Hayek; Mises; Schumpeter; Sargent; Real business cycle theory; B22; B25; E32; E43 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
http://hdl.handle.net/10.1007/s11138-011-0162-4 (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:revaec:v:25:y:2012:i:3:p:255-262
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11138/PS2
DOI: 10.1007/s11138-011-0162-4
Access Statistics for this article
The Review of Austrian Economics is currently edited by Peter Boettke and Christopher Coyne
More articles in The Review of Austrian Economics from Springer, Society for the Development of Austrian Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().