Re-switching and the Austrian business-cycle theory: A rejoinder

Saverio Fratini

The Review of Austrian Economics, 2019, vol. 32, issue 4, No 9, 383-389

Abstract: Abstract In these few pages I discuss some points concerning Lewin and Cachanosky’s Review of Austrian Economics, (2019) comment on my note (Fratini Review of Austrian Economics, 2019) about the implication of re-switching for the working of the Austrian business-cycle theory.

Keywords: Austrian business-cycle theory; Capital; Average period of production; B53; D21; D24; E32 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11138-019-00467-8 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:revaec:v:32:y:2019:i:4:d:10.1007_s11138-019-00467-8

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... ce/journal/11138/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11138-019-00467-8

Access Statistics for this article

The Review of Austrian Economics is currently edited by Peter Boettke and Christopher Coyne

More articles in The Review of Austrian Economics from Springer, Society for the Development of Austrian Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().