A “Primarily Property” Presumption Is—Still—Really Needed for the IP/Antitrust Interface

Lawrence J. White ()
Additional contact information
Lawrence J. White: New York University

Review of Industrial Organization, 2020, vol. 56, issue 4, No 9, 715-737

Abstract: Abstract Antitrust discussions in the U.S. have a long tradition of describing intellectual property (IP)—primarily patents and copyrights—in unqualified terms of “monopoly”. Although there have been substantial efforts over the past two decades to pull back from this automatic association, the presumption of unqualified monopoly continues to appear in important legal decisions—as well as in legal and social sciences academic discussions—that involve IP. There is another place where these decisions and discussions might start: with a presumption that any IP is “primarily property”—albeit with some important distinctions that separate IP from “garden variety” tangible property and that raise the possibility of market power in some instances. This paper explores the important similarities—and differences—between “garden variety” property, such as real estate, and IP; it concludes that the similarities are substantial, so that the presumption that IP is “primarily property” is a reasonable alternative starting point for antitrust/IP discussions. It then discusses some beneficial differences that this alternative starting point could have made and/or could still make.

Keywords: Antitrust; Intellectual property; Monopoly; Market power; Patent; Copyright; Trademark (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: K21 L40 O38 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11151-020-09760-4 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:revind:v:56:y:2020:i:4:d:10.1007_s11151-020-09760-4

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... on/journal/11151/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11151-020-09760-4

Access Statistics for this article

Review of Industrial Organization is currently edited by L.J. White

More articles in Review of Industrial Organization from Springer, The Industrial Organization Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().