Entrepreneur fund-seeking: toward a theory of funding fit in the era of equity crowdfunding

Regan Stevenson (), Sean R. McMahon (), Chaim Letwin () and Michael P. Ciuchta ()
Additional contact information
Regan Stevenson: Indiana University
Sean R. McMahon: Elon University
Chaim Letwin: Suffolk University
Michael P. Ciuchta: UMASS – Lowell

Small Business Economics, 2022, vol. 58, issue 4, No 16, 2086 pages

Abstract: Abstract Why do entrepreneurs prefer to seek one equity form of funding over another? To address this question, we develop a contingency-based model of perceived funding fit that delineates several factors that influence strategic fund-seeking decisions by entrepreneurs. In prior research, entrepreneur fund-seeking has largely been explained using models that rely on rule-based approaches (e.g., the pecking order assumption) or value capture considerations. In contrast, we propose a dynamic contingency-based model that delineates several factors that influence entrepreneur perceptions of funding fit over and above transactional efficiency, including atypical value creation from the fundraising process itself and external stakeholder values. We inductively assess our model in the context of equity crowdfunding (ECF) and find that perceived funding fit can motivate some strategic fund-seekers to opt to pursue ECF, even when they have a reasonable opportunity to obtain other more established sources of funding such as angel or seed-stage venture capital. This indicates that ECF in several cases is not a funding mode of last resort as proposed in prior literature. Plain English Summary Raising capital is a complex and dynamic process. Strategic entrepreneurs seek “funding fit” for their particular ventures leading some to opt for less established forms of funding such as equity crowdfunding for a variety of reasons beyond efficiency. Prior venture funding research has largely taken the view of the investor, emphasizing what entrepreneurs must do to win the favor of angel investors and other seed funders, and deeming equity crowdfunding (ECF) a funding mode of last resort for discouraged entrepreneurs. Inductively analyzing hundreds of regulatory filings, entrepreneur interviews, public information, and media pieces about ECF-funded firms, we find evidence that in several cases, strategic entrepreneurs may prefer to opt for ECF if they perceive it to be a better fit due to novel forms of nonfinancial value. We explain our findings by proposing an emergent contingency-based model of “funding fit.”

Keywords: L26; M13; Funding fit; Equity crowdfunding; Entrepreneurship; Capital raising; Venture investment; Venture finance; Value creation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s11187-021-00499-0 Abstract (text/html)
Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kap:sbusec:v:58:y:2022:i:4:d:10.1007_s11187-021-00499-0

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.springer. ... 29/journal/11187/PS2

DOI: 10.1007/s11187-021-00499-0

Access Statistics for this article

Small Business Economics is currently edited by Zoltan J. Acs and David B. Audretsch

More articles in Small Business Economics from Springer
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sonal Shukla () and Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing ().