Intragenerational deliberation and intergenerational sustainability dilemma

Raja Timilsina, Koji Kotani, Yoshinori Nakagawa and Tatsuyoshi Saijo ()
Additional contact information
Yoshinori Nakagawa: School of Economics and Management, Kochi University of Technology

No SDES-2019-14, Working Papers from Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management

Abstract: Many environmental problems have occurred because the current generation affects future generations, but the opposite is not true. This one-way nature induces the current generation to take advantage of resources without considering future generations, which we call “intergenerational sustainability dilemma (ISD).†While deliberation is known to bring a change in individual opinions and lead to a better decision in some intragenerational problems, little is known about how “intragenerational deliberation†affects individual opinions and collective decisions for “intergenerational problems such as ISD†in societies. To this end, an ISD game (ISDG) along with interviews and questionnaires are instituted in rural and urban areas of Nepalese societies. In ISDG, a sequence of six generations, each of which consists of three people, is organized, and each generation chooses either to maintain intergenerational sustainability (sustainable option) or to maximize her own generation’s payoff by irreversibly imposing a cost on future generations (unsustainable option) under intragenerational “deliberative†process. Our result demonstrates that urban subjects have a wider variety of individual initial opinions and support an unsustainable option more often than do rural subjects. It also shows that individual opinions change through deliberation when subjects in a generation do not share the same initial opinion, reflecting that more urban subjects change opinions; such opinion changes are identified not to work in the direction to enhance intergenerational sustainability for the urban generations. Overall, our experiment suggests that a closely-knit society such as rural areas in Nepal is a hope, and intragenerational deliberation neither effectively affect individual opinions for intergeneration sustainability nor resolve ISD.

Keywords: Intergenerational sustainability dilemma; deliberative process; opinion change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 48 pages
Date: 2019-12, Revised 2019-12
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-exp
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Published in SDE Series, December 2019, pages 1-48

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.souken.kochi-tech.ac.jp/seido/wp/SDES-2019-14.pdf First version, 2019 (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Intragenerational deliberation and intergenerational sustainability dilemma (2022)
Working Paper: Can deliberative democracy resolve intergenerational sustainability dilemma? (2017)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kch:wpaper:sdes-2019-14

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from Kochi University of Technology, School of Economics and Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sachiko Minami ().