Endowments-swapping-proofness and Efficiency in Multiple-Type Housing Markets
Di Feng
Additional contact information
Di Feng: Faculty of Business and Economics, University of Laussane, SWITZERLAND and Junir Research Fellow, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration (RIEB), Kobe University, JAPAN
No DP2023-14, Discussion Paper Series from Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University
Abstract:
For Shapley-Scarf housing markets (Shapley and Scarf, 1974), Fujinaka and Wakayama (2018) propose a new incentive property, endowments-swapping-proofness, that excludes manipulations that a pair of agents can conduct before the operation of the selected mechanism by swapping their endowments. We investigate endowments-swapping-proofness for Moulin (1995)'s multiple-type housing markets, which are an extension of Shapley-Scarf housing markets with multi-unit demands. Differing from Shapley-Scarf housing markets, for multiple-type housing markets, there are various ways to swap endowments. Motivated by this observation, we introduce three extensions of endowments-swapping-proofness: bundle endowments-swapping-proofness, one type endowments-swapping-proofness, and flexible endowments-swapping-proofness. Based on the first two weaker endowments-swapping-proofness properties that we propose, and other well-studied properties (individual rationality, strategy-proofness, and non-bossiness), on several domains of preference profiles, we provide characterizations of two extensions of the top-trading-cycles (TTC) mechanism: the bundle top-trading cycles (bTTC) mechanism and the coordinatewise top-trading-cycles (cTTC) mechanism. Moreover, we also show that the strongest possible endowments-swapping-proofness property (flexible endowments-swapping-proofness) leads to an impossibility. Furthermore, our results explicitly show that our new properties correspond to efficiency notions.
Keywords: Multiple-type housing markets; Endowments-swapping-proofness; Strategy proofness; Constrained efficiency; Top-trading-cycles (TTC) mechanism; Market designy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C78 D47 D61 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 72 pages
Date: 2023-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-des and nep-ure
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp/academic/ra/dp/English/DP2023-14.pdf First version, 2023 (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kob:dpaper:dp2023-14
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in Discussion Paper Series from Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University 2-1 Rokkodai, Nada, Kobe 657-8501 JAPAN. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Office of Promoting Research Collaboration, Research Institute for Economics & Business Administration, Kobe University (kenjo@rieb.kobe-u.ac.jp).