Comparing Quantitative and Qualitative Survey Data

Rolf Schenker

No 07-169, KOF Working papers from KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich

Abstract: This paper compares quantitative and qualitative data on firm level. The data is taken from two Swiss investment surveys. This has not yet been done in the literature. We will see that the mean change in investment of firms planning to increase (decrease) investments is positive (negative). In contrast, the mean change in investment of firms indicating "no change" is indeed virtually zero. Carlson \& Parkin (1975) assume the quantitative observations to follow a normal distribution. Other research (e.g. Dasgupta \& Lahiri 1992) has been done assuming other distributions. In this paper we show that the micro data does not follow a normal, logistic or exponential distribution. Furthermore, we adopt the response functions presented by Ronning (1984) to the investment data. They help us to determine the share of firms giving the different qualitative statement for every instance of the quantitative data. We will show that with larger (smaller) quantitative changes, more firms give positive (negative) qualitative statements.

Keywords: Response Functions; Investment survey; Qualitative response; Contingency Table (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 10 pages
Date: 2007-06
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-bec and nep-mac
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
http://dx.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-a-010805518 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kof:wpskof:07-169

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in KOF Working papers from KOF Swiss Economic Institute, ETH Zurich Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().