EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Uniqueness in Two-type Signalling Games: Finite Response Sets vs. Continuum Response Sets

Svend Albæk and Per Overgaard ()
Additional contact information
Svend Albæk: Institute of Economics, University of Copenhagen

No 94-02, Discussion Papers from University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics

Abstract: The paper considers signalling games with two types of informed player. When the informed player's payoff function satisfies certain sorting and type monotonicity conditions, and when the uninformed player's response is a smooth strictly monotone mapping from posterior beliefs, the results of Cho and Sobel (1990) establish existence of a unique refined equilibrium outcome which is separating. However, when the response set is finite, refined pooling equilibria generally exist. We consider the finite-response case, and our results are as follows: For every prior probability assessment over the two types there is a finite number of responses ¯n(?0), where ?0 is the prior weight on the "good" type, such that for every n = ¯n(?0) no pooling can be part of a refined equilibrium. I.e., if Nature chooses ?0 from some continuous probability distribution on the unit interval, then the probability that refined pooling equilibria exist goes to zero when n increases withut bound. In the limit the measure is zero as shown by Cho and Sobel.

Keywords: signalling games; equilibrium refinement; uniqueness; finite response sets; continuum sets (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C72 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Pages: 21 pages
Date: 1992-11, Revised 1994-02
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

There are no downloads for this item, see the EconPapers FAQ for hints about obtaining it.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:kud:kuiedp:9402

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Discussion Papers from University of Copenhagen. Department of Economics Oester Farimagsgade 5, Building 26, DK-1353 Copenhagen K., Denmark. Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Thomas Hoffmann ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:kud:kuiedp:9402