How to play the games? Nash versus Berge behavior rules

Pierre Courtois, Rabia Nessah (r.nessah@ieseg.fr) and Tarik Tazdaït

Working Papers from LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier

Abstract: Social interactions regularly lead to mutually beneficial transactions that are sometimes puzzling. The prisoner’s dilemma and the chicken and trust games prove to be less perplexing than Nash equilibrium predicts. Moral preferences seem to complement self-oriented motivations and their relative predominance in games is found to vary according to the individuals, their environment, and the game. This paper examines the appropriateness of Berge equilibrium to study several 2×2 game situations, notably cooperative games where mutual support yields socially better outcomes. We consider the Berge behavior rule complementarily to Nash: individuals play one behavior rule or another, depending on the game situation. We then define non-cooperative Berge equilibrium, discuss what it means to play in this fashion, and argue why individuals may choose to do so. Finally, we discuss the relationship between Nash and Berge notions and analyze the rationale of individuals playing in a situational perspective.

Pages: 25 pages
Date: 2011-02, Revised 2011-02
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-evo, nep-gth and nep-hpe
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lameta.univ-montp1.fr/Documents/DR2011-05.pdf First version, 2011 (application/pdf)
Our link check indicates that this URL is bad, the error code is: 500 Can't connect to www.lameta.univ-montp1.fr:80 (No such host is known. )

Related works:
Journal Article: HOW TO PLAY GAMES? NASH VERSUS BERGE BEHAVIOUR RULES (2015)
Working Paper: How to Play Games? Nash versus Berge Behavior Rules (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lam:wpaper:11-05

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in Working Papers from LAMETA, Universtiy of Montpellier Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Patricia Modat (web@lameta.univ-montp1.fr this e-mail address is bad, please contact repec@repec.org).