A Value Chain Approach to Measuring Distortions to Incentives and Food Policy Effects (with application to Pakistan's grain policy)
Elena Briones Alonso and
Johan Swinnen
LICOS Discussion Papers from LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven
Abstract:
We develop an extended Nominal Rate of Assistance (NRA) methodology to disentangle the welfare impacts of policies for various interest groups along the value chain (to disaggregate effects within the "producer" and "consumer" umbrellas). We apply our value chain NRA methodology to the case of Pakistan's price and trade policy. We analyse the welfare implications for various agents in the wheat-flour value chain from 2000 to 2013, a period characterized by major global price volatility and by regular adjustments of domestic policies. We find that the wheat price policy has generally benefitted flour consumers and wheat traders at the expense of wheat farmers and to a lesser extent flour millers. Our findings illustrate that the welfare implications of policies can be quite different within the "producer" and "consumer" umbrellas, which has potentially important implications for economic and political economy analyses and for the design of policies that aim to target the poorest groups along value chains.
Date: 2015
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-agr and nep-int
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)
Downloads: (external link)
http://feb.kuleuven.be/drc/licos/publications/dp/dp366
Related works:
Working Paper: A Value Chain Approach to Measuring Distortions to Incentives and Food Policy Effects (with application to Pakistan’s grain policy) (2015) 
Working Paper: A value chain approach to measuring distortions to incentives and food policy effects (with application to Pakistan’s grain policy) (2015) 
Working Paper: A value chain approach to measuring distortions to incentives and food policy effects (with application to Pakistan’s grain policy) (2015) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lic:licosd:36615
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in LICOS Discussion Papers from LICOS - Centre for Institutions and Economic Performance, KU Leuven Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().