Wealth Distribution and Individual Voting Preferences: A Comparative Perspective

Piotr Paradowski () and Lindsay Flynn ()

No 19, LWS Working papers from LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg

Abstract: Theories of economic voting have provided essential insights into determinants of voting behavior. With increasing levels of economic inequality and polarization among voters and elites, economic voting may be of even greater salience today. Historically, economic voting has been measured by income or class but never by wealth. Wealth inequality, however, is typically twice as large as income inequality. This paper extends the political science literature to examine the role of wealth in voting behavior by examining three countries, each considered ideal types for particular political and social regimes. Greater levels of both wealth and income are associated with a greater likelihood of voting for a conservative party in the United States, a liberal welfare regime. Income and employment matter more in Germany, a corporatist regime. Despite increasing wealth and income inequality, there is little support for economic voting in Sweden, the classic social-democratic regime. The findings of this paper indicate that economic voting is mediated by political and economic context. Individual-level data are drawn from the American National Election Studies (ANES), the Comparative Study of Electoral Systems (CSES), and the Luxembourg Wealth Study (LWS) Database. Statistical matching methods are utilized to integrate electoral and wealth surveys, and probit regression models are used to analyze relationships quantitatively.

Pages: 13 pages
Date: 2024-04
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-pol
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Published in “Can Unequal Distributions of Wealth Influence Vote Choice? A Comparative Study of Germany, Sweden and the United States”, in Public Policy, Governance and Polarization: Making Governance Work, edited by David K. Jesuit and Russell Alan Williams, Chapter 3. New York, NY: Routledge Critical Studies in Public Management, 2017.

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lisdatacenter.org/wps/lwswps/19.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lis:lwswps:19

Access Statistics for this paper

More papers in LWS Working papers from LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Piotr Paradowski ().