Endogenous growth, convexity of damages and climate risk: how Nordhaus� framework supports deep cuts in carbon emissions
Simon Dietz and
Nicholas Stern
No 159, GRI Working Papers from Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment
Abstract:
To slow or not to slow� (Nordhaus, 1991) was the first economic appraisal of greenhouse gas emissions abatement and founded a large literature on a topic of great, worldwide importance. In this paper we offer our assessment of the original article and trace its legacy, in particular Nordhaus� later series of �DICE� models. From this work many have drawn the conclusion that an efficient global emissions abatement policy comprises modest and modestly increasing controls. On the contrary, we use DICE itself to provide an initial illustration that, if the analysis is extended to take more strongly into account three essential elements of the climate problem � the endogeneity of growth, the convexity of damages, and climate risk � optimal policy comprises strong controls. To focus on these features and facilitate comparison with Nordhaus� work, all of the analysis is conducted with a high pure-time discount rate, notwithstanding its problematic ethical foundations.
Date: 2014-05
New Economics Papers: this item is included in nep-ene and nep-env
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (21)
Downloads: (external link)
http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/ ... z-and-Stern-2014.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:lsg:lsgwps:wp159
Access Statistics for this paper
More papers in GRI Working Papers from Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by The GRI Administration ().